Showing posts with label democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label democrats. Show all posts

Sunday, August 18, 2024

What is the core difference between Democrats and Republicans?


 



This is the core issue between Democrats and Republicans, especially the white nationalists and Christo-fascists.


Democrats realize that when you help others and lift them up, you also do the same for yourself. We celebrate others; successes, console them during challenging times, and help find solutions that improve the world. We seek change and positive forward movement, which is based on inclusion and diversity. Life is diverse. Not everyone looks, believes, loves, or wants the same. By honoring and celebrating this truism, our lives become happier, joyful, and peaceful. We're not perfect, but then again we don't need to be.


The white nationalists and Christo-fascists refuse to take responsibility for what they say, do, and cause to happen. It's never their fault. Someone else is always to blame. It's a self-perpetuating cycle of blaming others for the lack of control in their own lives. Yet, at the same time, they blame others for interfering in their lives, they also believe "the others" are lesser than themselves. It's a hypocrisy that keeps them locked in ignorance, resentment, and rage.






Thursday, January 24, 2013

No Label: No Budget No Pay--Making Congress Work

Due to illness the show has been rescheduled to January29, 2013
 
Until You Walk The Path, You Won’t Know Where it Goes will be chatting with Michigan's No Label leader, Jill Rahrig on January 29, 2013 at 1 pm eastern as she talks about the No Labels movement.

No Labels is a growing citizens’ movement of Democrats, Republicans and everything in between dedicated to promoting a new politics of problem solving. No Labels' Five Leadership Principles include:





1. Tell citizens the full truth about our national challenges
2. Govern for the future - not the next election
3. Put Country ahead of Party
4. Be responsible and accountable
5. Work together.



The No Labels' website www.nolabels.org




Tune into http://www.blogtalkradio.com/theresachaze on January 29, 2013 at 1 pm eastern to listen to to learn more about No Labels and holding our politicians responsible for working together. The phone lines and chat will be available for those who wish to ask questions. The phone number is (347) 838-9927.



The interview will be available in the archives at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/theresachaze/2013/01/25/until-you-walk-the-path-you-wont-know-where-it





Friday, September 26, 2008

Politicizing the Financial Crisis: McCain Self Serving Gamble

Politicizing the Financial Crisis

Both parties are using this national crisis to further their own agendas. Instead of focusing on the good of the country, they have used this emergency to beat up each other up. Early Thursday afternoon, there was basic agreement reached until McCain arrived and the political games began. Within a couple of hours, the bi-partisan spirit had evaporated.

Greed and stupidity created the credit crisis. Financial companies who became top heavy with exorbitant salaries and bonus for the management was the fuse. The deceptive loan practices combined with loans made in bad faith by both parties were the match. However, it was the gluttony of the oil companies who were the explosive. The domino effect of the rapidly rising gas prices destabilized the economy, increasing the cost of living and forcing businesses to cut back on payroll. While jobs were lost or down sized, people were paying more just too simply exist. The cost of living increases combined with the escalating interest rates were more than some households could withstand. Solvent households began to dissolve under the financial pressure, which in turned destabilized the already fragile balance of the financial system. The undermining of the financial institutions has had a cascading effect on the whole economy. Although governmental intervention is not the preferred route, it is the only one left at this point in time that will act as stopgap to the collapse of the country’s financial structure.

McCain suspending his campaign to jump on his white horse to rush to save the economy look more like a fool riding a hobbyhorse instead of knight in shining armor. Both Obama and McCain are only two senators out of a hundred. Neither of them were serving on any financial or banking committee; therefore, they didn’t need to have their boots on the ground for an agreement to be hammered out. On September 19, a bailout agreement had been written; there were still issues to be worked out. However, at a press conference at 1:41 pm eastern on September 25, a bi-partisan press released announced that an agreement had been reached. Yet it was soon after McCain’s arrival that Republicans suddenly withdrew their support. Without a doubt, McCain used his influence within his party to squash the agreement in order to further his own political agenda. It was quite clear McCain and his comrades wanted to bolster his falling numbers by attaching his name to the bailout. Who knows what was said behind Republican closed doors that made the agreeing member change their minds. The end results revealed that they cared more about partisan politics than effectively dealing with the issue at hand.

If politics and partisanships were replaced by common sense and good business, the solutions would be simple. By addressing the core issues appropriate measures could be taken.

The issues:

1. Rising gas prices have increased the cost of living and eliminated jobs.

2. Rising interest rates from flexible loans have caused people to default on their mortgages.

3. Excessive salaries and bonuses for loan executives as well as for those in oil companies and the oil speculation have caused harm to the companies involved as well as country’s economic health.

4. The defaulting mortgages have caused the financial institutions to become unstable.

Solutions:

An immediate cure for the energy crisis won’t happen over night. However, a great deal of the price increases are based on oil speculation. If a mandate was set that purchaser had to accept delivery of the oil within 30 days of purchase, the speculator would be forced to rethink their investment. It would not be a permanent solution, but it would make the price of gas drop.

The bailout would have to not only shore up the economy from the business end, but help the consumer as well.

1. Flexible mortgage rates would be immediately lowered back to the initial rate and permanently fixed with credit given for any monies paid in interest at the higher rate to be immediately taken off the loan.

2. Those in foreclosure should be given the opportunity to refinance at the original rate and start fresh.

3. All bonuses paid to the management of the loan companies for the past 12 months need to be immediately be repaid. If their company is failing they weren’t doing their job and don’t deserve to be rewarded. If they can’t write a check, then assets and property need to be seized.

4. No golden parachutes for anyone in the failing companies. Their actions have caused people to loose their homes; it is only right that the favor be returned.

5. There should be extreme oversight to how the people’s money is spent. If an administrator uses a tissue to blow her or his nose, there needs to be a full explanation in triplicate to how many tissues were used and why.

6. The bailout is a loan not a gift. Stockholders accepted profits that their company didn’t have the financial stability to give. Until the company has paid back the taxpayers in full, no dividends will be given.

7. Executives will no longer be paid exorbitant salaries or benefits. In businesses in other countries, CEO’s are paid 20% more than the person who takes out the trash. There are no expense accounts or special treatments for sitting behind a desk.

8. Each company will be assigned nine executors. There needs to be a 2/3 major in order for an expenditure to be approved.

7. There needs be a public accounting of all business activity every month. Every expenditure and the reason for it needs to be released to the media for prime time release. Shuffling the information out in the late Friday afternoon dump will not be acceptable.

9. All restrictions will remain effective until the loan has been repaid and the company has once again become solvent on its own.


Uncomplicated and practical, these simply stated restrictions will not only stabilize the economy but also rebuild the financial base of the country.

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

The Delegates yet to Vote: The 2008 Presidential Election not Preordained

The Delegates yet to Vote: The 2008 Presidential Election not Preordained

For months, the political pundits, the candidates, and the media have all been declaring that the elections are a done deal. The conventions are still weeks off. The election is months in the future; yet each side is claiming victory. However, there has yet to be one ballot to be cast, one vote to be counted in either on the convention floors or in the ballot boxes. Both McCain and Obama are the presumptive candidate nothing more. Nothing has been written in stone for either party nor will it be until after the conventions. The delegates are not required to vote for any one candidate, but have the ability to change their minds and their vote.

There is so much more information available about McCain and Obama not only through the vetting process, but also through their words and deeds, which calls into, question their motives for wanting to be President as well as their ability to lead. Neither man has been forthright. McCain courts the women voters, while time and again voting against bills that support women’s issues, needs and civil rights. Obama claims to be the candidate of change, yet every time the tide started to turn against him, he opened the good old boys club’s bag of dirty tricks and made full use of them--creating just more of dirty politics as usual. So much for change.


McCain’s comments today only reinforce this belief that we can keep indiscriminately flying like hawks around the world while our nest is crumbling. His economic, social and political policies are out of date, out of touch with reality and out only to benefit the oil companies. Drilling off shore and in protected nature zones only benefit the oil companies by increasing their already record-breaking profits. Alternative energy is not only viable but also available, yet it is being kept from used by obsolete zoning regulations and misleading information. The Pickens Plan is only a good start to new energy sources that are not only efficient and cost effective, but also totally renewable. However, by giving individuals energy freedom, it would shift the power away from the large corporations and put it back in the hands of the people. Socially, he is just one of the good old boys who support white men knowing what is best for the rest of us poor dumb slobs. From Pro-life votes to Immigration reform, McCain voted for the best interest of big business without even a vague thought for what is good for the people of the United States.


Obama was the first to use race when he subtlety threatened the Super Delegates, declaring there would be riots in the streets if the Super Delegates ignored the will of the people and took the vote away from him. Clinton narrowly won the popular vote and it was Obama campaign who usurped the will of the people. In addition, he was part of the whole system that devalued the voters of Michigan and Florida into less than slaves. Slaves were considered 3/5 of a person, while the voters in both states became half persons. Since Clinton conceded, he as chuckled and said just kidding; you all can cast your full vote for me in August. Gee, mighty white of you Bubba. In addition, in those states where he polled badly, he gave them as much attention during the primary campaign as Bush did as he flew over New Orleans. Instead, he focused his attention on bolstering his lead in states where he was already popular. After all small town voters are just hicks are too attached to our religions and guns to know the way of the world. He might be a big rock singer with golden fingers whose loved every where he goes, but he doesn’t know jack about what women want and need or the small town voters who are the backbone of this country.

Both Obama and McCain are more flash than substance. Neither of them have realistic or substantive plans to help the country climb out of the deep hole Bush shoved us into. If you voted for one or the other and now regret your choice, contact your delegates and persuade them to change their vote at the convention. If you are a delegate, know that you are not legally bound to vote any other way than your conscious. Just because a candidate suspended their campaign, it doesn’t mean they are out of the race. They can still be nominated and voted for at the convention. If you haven’t been liking what you are seeing or hearing, speak up to not only your party but also those who represent you at the convention. Let your voice be heard, even if you have to write in your candidate of choice.

Technorati Tags:
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Glass Ceilings and Forward Momentum: It's Time for the Old Goats to Find an Iceburg

Just looking at the line of candidate proves that one or more of the glass ceilings is going to be shattered by the end of 2008. The Republican candidates are dried up, old white men who are propagating the same old ideas, while the Democratic team is fresh, young and inventive; Clinton and Obama represent gender and ethic advancements that will revolutionize and reenergize the country for decades, while Edwards support of the middle and low class will change the focus will lead to economic and social change.

With the exception of Ron Paul, the Republican candidates are touting their version of Reagan economics. The famous trickle down theory give tax breaks and financial support to the upper 5-10%, in hope that the money would trickle down the lower end of the financial spectrum. In reality, the theory should be called the pissed on theory. The upper 5-10% eat caviar and drink champaign, while the rest of the country is expected to consume their waste. By working from the top down with tax cuts and economic support, jobs and financial stability is not created for the whole of the country. It just creates extra wealth for the few. Working from the bottom up, by provide economic stimulus in the form of tax cuts, education, job training and benefit support, people will have the money to pay for services and goods, which in turn will create jobs. The top three of the Democratic candidates support programs that work from the least of us upward. They don’t base their economic growth programs on the generosity of the few. Instead, their goal is to create the opportunities to give a hand up, instead of handout.

Social issues also radically separate the two parties. While the Republicans are emphasizing their religious affiliation, along with the social and moral restrictions of their beliefs, the Democrats are socially, morally and ethically aware of the individual. Once again, the Republicans are courting the religious right as way to regain the White House. The Right wingers are looking for a candidate who will continue to spread their bigotry and religious view point; most continue to seek to change this country from a democracy to a theocracy. They seek to limit the individual’s right to medical, religious, and life style freedoms by forcing others to conform to their religious values. The Democrats on the other hand are seeking to stay out of the individual’s private life by focusing on creating jobs, protecting the environment, and creating homeland security by regaining the country’s honor and the respect of other nations. With the democrats, civil liberties would be respected, as will the right to privacy. They have better things to do than to spy on the citizens of this country; in short, they don’t care who others have sex with or in what position. They have more important issues on their plate.

The same elected officials, who screeched war was the answer, are the same ones who are under-funding the physical, emotional and spiritual support the returning veterans. The extended tours, the quick rotation back to the sandbox and the lack of proper protective gear, have done more damage to the troops than the enemy could have imagined in their wildest dreams. PTS, lost of limbs, and closed head injures have affected an overwhelming number of the veterans. They are no longer to are capable of providing for themselves, yet the government has refused to step up to the plate and provide the needed care. According the VA statistics, 200,000 vets are currently homeless. The universal health care programs that are proposed by the Democrats would not only help every American, but would give the vets the care they need. But in order to for the vets to reclaim their lives, they will need not only medical support but economic during their healing process. They supported their country; it is time for the country to return the favor.

The Republicans have not devised a comprehensive plan to withdraw troops. Instead, they repeat the battle cry and send more troops into harms way. They point fingers and label those who seek political alternatives as unpatriotic. They claim that that the only way to keep the country safe is to win the war. That is a medieval concept. No one wins war, there are only varying degrees of loosing. In addition, their concept of winning is unreasonable. It is impossible to force another country to become democratic. The definition of democratic is a government that is has free and equal participation by the people. It is for the natives to chose their form of government, not an occupying force. All of the Democratic candidates had exit strategies that involve diplomatic resolutions instead of brut force. It is childish to think that bullying others will lead to long term change. It only create new enemies.

The question every voter must ask her or himself is what kind of future do you want for yourself and future generations. Republican candidates represent status quo and stagnation. The are for the corporate conglomerates, which have All three front running contenders for the Democratic party represent positive change for all Americans not just the limited few. They represent diversity and equality. The difference between the candidates is forward momentum and the lack there of.